Journal of Food Bioactives, ISSN 2637-8752 print, 2637-8779 online
Journal website www.isnff-jfb.com

Original Research

Volume 9, March 2020, pages 58-69


Low frequency, high power ultrasound: a non-thermal green technique improves phenolic fractions (free, conjugated glycoside, conjugated esters and bound) in fermented seabuckthorn beverage

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Phenolic fractional profile (free, bound, glycoside and ester conjugated (a) and free vs bound, glycoside and ester conjugated (b) of defatted whole SB using traditional (TEM), 10 min US (US10), and 15 min US (US15) assisted extractions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Seabuckthorn puree (P) without and with ultrasound treatment (P+US) on day 0 and 21.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Kombucha (K) samples without and with sugar (S) and without and with ultrasound treatment (US) on day 0, 5 and 21.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Total microbial count (log CFU/mL) of samples with and without US on day 0, 2, 5, 14 and 21.

Tables

Table 1. Chemical and nutritional analysis of seabuckthorn berries
 
FruitNo-USAfter US
CAE: Chlorogenic acid equivalent US: Ultrasound.
Moisture%80.0078.80
Juice (Yield %)66.1065.90
pH2.60–2.802.60–3.20
Acidity%2.80–2.902.70–2.80
°Brix (TSS)8.208.30
TPC (mg CAE/100g)550600
SynersisAfter 2 hrAfter 4 weeks

 

Table 2. Free, bound, and conjugated phenolic acids and flavonoids in SB berries (mg/kg of dry matter)
 
Phenolic acidsFlavonoidsTotal
Gallic acidProto catechuic acidVanillic acidP-coumaric acidFerulic acidRutinQuercetinKaempferol
Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. The same letters in a column indicate no significant difference using one-way ANOVA (significance: P < 0.05). ND: not determined.
Traditional
  FreeND20.7 ± 2.3bNDNDND39.0 ± 7.8a23.2 ± 5.4bc18.9 ± 6.5d109.0 ± 12.9de
  Bound7.7 ± 1.0d139.6 ± 5.3a5.4 ± 0.8b39.3 ± 2.4a9.6 ± 1.8bcNDNDND201.5 ± 5.8cd
  Conjugated
    EstersND24.8 ± 5.0b2.0 ± 0.8b7.2 ± 3.2c33.9 ± 7.0a32.5 ± 5.5aNDND100.3 ± 6.7de
    Glycosides1,492.7 ± 184.5aND52.5 ± 27.5a3.4 ± 0.9cNDND26.5 ± 3.7b68.6 ± 9.0b1,643.7 ± 176.1a
  Total1,500.4185.159.949.843.571.549.794.62,054.5
US-10
  FreeND3.7 ± 0.5eNDNDND23.4 ± 3.5b47.6 ± 0.1a37.7 ± 0.1c112.3 ± 4.0de
  Bound4.5 ± 1.1d13.6 ± 2.9c1.6 ± 0.2b26.7 ± 6.5b6.5 ± 0.4bcNDNDND52.9 ± 9.0e
  Conjugated
    EstersND6.9 ± 1.2de0.7 ± 0.1b2.7 ± 0.8c11.9 ± 2.7b10.0 ± 1.1cNDND32.3 ± 1.8e
    Glycosides212.1 ± 2.9c25.3 ± 0.1b19.4 ± 5.8bNDNDNDNDND256.8 ± 5.0c
  Total216.549.621.729.518.433.447.637.7454.3
US-15
  FreeND8.7 ± 0.9cdeNDNDND15.2 ± 0.7c19.4 ± 1.9c15.6 ± 2.0d58.9 ± 4.1e
  Bound6.6 ± 3.0d13.6 ± 3.0c1.6 ± 0.3b28.1 ± 4.1b5.4 ± 0.2cNDNDND55.3 ± 9.8e
  Conjugated
    Esters0.6 ± 0.1d11.7 ± 2.8cd0.7 ± 0.4b7.8 ± 0.4c31.6 ± 0. 1a16.2 ± 0.6bcNDND68.5 ± 3.0e
    Glycosides1,080.1 ± 48.5bNDNDNDNDND21.4 ± 2.9bc85.4 ± 9.2a1,186.9 ± 40.4b
  Total1,087.334.02.236.037.031.440.8100.91,369.7

 

Table 3. Moisture, ash, protein and fat contents as percentage of P and P+US
 
SampleMoistureAshProteinFat content pulp (%)Fat content seed (%)
P: purée with 30% water; US: ultrasonic treatment. Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. The same letters in a column indicate no significant difference using one-way ANOVA (significance: P < 0.05).
P87.5 ± 0.2a1.52 ± 0.00a9.80 ± 0.46a19.04 ± 0.08a14.81 ± 0.08a
P+US88.7 ± 1.8a1.51 ± 0.00a9.84 ± 0.85a20.97 ± 0.29b15.83 ± 0.28b

 

Table 4. Rancimat results (Induction time, h) as a measure of oxidative stability for samples with and without US
 
SampleInduction time
P: purée with 30% water; US: ultrasonic treatment; K: kombucha; S: sugar. Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. The same letters indicate no significant difference using one-way ANOVA (significance: P < 0.05).
P2.66 ± 0.35a
K0.10 ± 0.01b
K+S0.13 ± 0.02b
P + US2.91 ± 1.46a
K+US0.22 ± 0.10b
K+S+US0.40 ± 0.28b

 

Table 5. ORAC (µmol TE/L) results for samples with and without US on day 0,2,5,7 and 21
 
ORACDay
025721
N/A: not applicable; P: purée with 30% water; K: kombucha; S: sugar; US: ultrasonic treatment. Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. The same letters in a column indicate no significant difference using one-way ANOVA (significance: P < 0.05).
P305.96 ± 0.29bN/AN/A300.83 ± 3.89b298.30 ± 2.35ab
KN/A301.18 ± 3.24a299.51 ± 8.07aN/A280.01 ± 7.18c
K+SN/A302.23 ± 1.33a286.01 ± 4.94bN/A283.39 ± 14.06c
P+US315.42 ± 1.76aN/AN/A309.99 ± 0.85a300.40 ± 1.58ab
K+USN/A311.65 ± 15.12a305.87 ± 9.95aN/A308.98 ± 8.15a
K+S+USN/A298.12 ± 4.66a282.66 ± 11.22bN/A289.09 ± 5.97ab

 

Table 6. Vitamin C concentration (g/L) for samples with and without US
 
SampleVitamin C
P: purée with 30% water; US: ultrasonic treatment; K: kombucha; S: sugar. Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. The same letters in a column indicate no significant difference using one-way ANOVA (significance: P < 0.05).
P2.31 ± 0.83a
K0.20 ± 0.02b
K+S0.15 ± 0.00b
P + US1.65 ± 0.12a
K+US0.10 ± 0.03b
K+S+US0.19 ± 0.10b

 

Table 7. Water Solubility Index (%) and Water Absorption Index (g/g) of freeze dried samples without and without US
 
SampleWater Solubility IndexWater Absorption Index
P: purée with 30% water; K: kombucha; US: ultrasonic treatment; S: sugar. Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. The same letters in a column indicate no significant difference using one-way ANOVA (significance: P < 0.05).
P46.81 ± 3.03d6.64 ± 0.70b
K61.60 ± 1.65c3.97 ± 0.75c
K+S83.31 ± 1.34a1.19 ± 0.02d
P + US44.62 ± 1.93d9.29 ± 1.56a
K+US59.25 ± 0.49c4.62 ± 2.58bc
K+S+US89.93 ± 5.42a1.39 ± 0.18d