Journal of Food Bioactives, ISSN 2637-8752 print, 2637-8779 online
Journal website www.isnff-jfb.com

Review

Volume 4, Number , December 2018, pages 107-116


The effects of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers on obesity and diabetes: a review

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Signal transduction cascade of sweet receptors.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Chemical structure of the non-volatile sweetness enhancers. DHB: 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; ADTP: 4-amino-5,6-dimethylthieno(2,3-D) pyrimidin-2(1H)-one; ADBT: 3-(4-amino-2, 2-dioxido-1H-2,1,3- benzothiadiazin-5-yloxy)-2,2-dimethyl-N-propylpropanamide.

Table

Table 1. Selected high-potency sweeteners
 
Compound classCompound nameSweetness potencyReference
Sweetness potency is given relative to sucrose on a weight comparison
DisaccharidesSucrose1.0DuBois (2016)
MonosaccharideGlucose0.6
L-Fructose0.6
D-Fructose1.27
D-allulose0.7Mooradian et al. (2017)
D-tagatose0.92
D-sorbose0.7
D-allose0.8
Sugar alcoholErythritol0.6–0.8Grembecka (2015)
Isomalt0.45–0.65
Lactitol0.3–0.4
Maltitol0.9
Mannitol0.5–0.7
Sorbitol0.5–0.7
Xylitol1.0
Artificial and natural sweetenersAcesulfame-K100–200Beltrami et al. (2018); Mooradian et al. (2017)
Advantame20,000–40,000
Aspartame100–200
Cyclamate∼30
Neohesperidin dihydrochalchone250–2,000
Neotame7,000–13,000
Saccharin300–500
Sucralose∼600
Stevioside210
rebaudioside30–242
Mogroside IV233–292
Mogroside V250–425
ProteinsBrazzein500–2,000Behrens et al. (2011); Beltrami et al. ( 2018)
Curculin (neoculin)550–9,000
Mabinlin375
Monellin3,000
Pentadin500
Thaumatin1,600–10,000